The $79 Million Bluff: Why Tech Super PACs Failed to Bend the 2024 Wave

Posted on by

(SeaPRwire) –   $79 million. That is the record-breaking sum AI super PACs dumped into 68 House and Senate races this cycle. Yet, the money failed to break the Democratic wave. Tech Influence Watch data shows the industry finally woke up, but its bets mostly missed the mark. The biggest fight happened in New York’s 12th District primary. Leading the Future spent $8.1 million against Alex Bores. Public First countered with $15 million. Bores lost. The race became the most expensive House primary of the year with over $40 million in outside money.

Look at the split. One camp wants light regulation and a single national AI standard. Ben Horowitz, Marc Andreessen, and Greg Brockman funded this side. They used groups like Think Big and American Mission. The other camp wants stronger safeguards. Public First backed candidates through Jobs and Democracy and Defending Our Values. As of October 26, Leading the Future had $34 million in cash but only spent $7.4 million on general elections. The money went quiet. The general election results reflect this silence.

The disconnect is stark. American Mission spent $4.8 million on Darline Graham in South Carolina. It was their biggest general election bet. Annie Andrews won 51.1% to 46.7%. She attacked Graham as “Data Center Darline.” In Nebraska, Defending Our Values backed Pete Ricketts with $274,485. He won 50.3% to 43.7%. Most other Republicans backed by these networks lost. The Democrats won their races because of the broader wave, not tech money. Exceptions include Harriet Hageman in Wyoming, backed by American Mission.

Specific House races show the drift. Think Big supported Jared Moskowitz in Florida’s 25th District with $259,574. He won. But Defending Our Values spent $857,426 on Scott Singer, who lost. American Mission backed Aaron Flint in Montana’s 1st District with $590,428. Flint conceded to Sam Forstag. The same PAC supported Laurie Buckhout in North Carolina’s 1st District with $509,367. She conceded to Don Davis. Tech money could not save these incumbents or challengers from the national trend.

This is not a story about tech buying control. It is a story about tech buying seats on a sinking ship. The two networks fought different wars. One wanted deregulation. The other wanted job protections. But the voters ignored the PAC ads. They voted on the broader Democratic wave. The $34 million sitting in Leading the Future’s account is now a dead asset. Alex Bores is already raising for his new nonprofit, Who Decides. He targets $30 million before 2028. The cycle is far from over.

The algorithm failed to predict the human vote.