Schumer’s Move to Prevent Shutdown Sparks Democratic Discord
` tags:
This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up to get stories like this sent to your inbox.
The Senate’s recent action to prevent a government shutdown – which essentially handed over spending authority to President Trump and relegated Congress to a mere advisory role – was a significant concession that has understandably angered the Democratic base.
The anger within the Democratic Party is largely directed at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York. He had indicated the previous day that the battle was lost and it was time to move forward. The choice was between maintaining a reduced government operation and shutting it down completely, and the outcome speaks volumes.
However, this doesn’t mean anyone in the party was pleased with how things unfolded.
When asked if the Senate Democrats needed new leadership, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries avoided defending Schumer, simply stating, “Next question.” Elsewhere, there was open discussion about challenging Schumer in the 2028 election.
On Friday, nine Senate Democrats, along with Independent Angus King of Maine (who aligns with them), joined nearly all Senate Republicans to avert a shutdown. This temporary spending measure grants the White House greater freedom to close down numerous federal programs created by Congress and eliminate thousands of jobs. Until September 30, Congress is essentially allowing for a stronger executive branch with the power to use allocated funds with considerable discretion.
It was a disappointing conclusion to a difficult week for Democrats. Besides dealing with the turmoil caused by the Trump White House through new executive orders, personnel changes, and tariffs, they also faced the pressure of an impending government shutdown. House Republicans presented Democrats with a partisan spending bill that was particularly harsh in its cuts to the District of Columbia. Then, the House adjourned, leaving the Senate with no opportunity to revise the spending plan. Subsequently, Schumer asserted on Wednesday that the framework had enough support to pass, and then, a day later, he announced his support for the spending structure to avoid a shutdown.
This abrupt shift from advocating for a shutdown to supporting a continuation of funding only intensified the resentment many Democrats already felt toward their current leaders.
“Whatever happens will happen,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, who voted “no” and expressed a sense of resignation in the hours leading up to the votes.
This resignation has been palpable in Washington lately. The fight among Trump opponents has diminished as Trump’s apparent takeover of the spending system seemed increasingly likely. The White House’s celebratory boasting and the antics surrounding its pet project DOGE fueled the anger of Democrats, who have been striving to protect all aspects of the federal government.
In the end, the Democrats who could have stopped Trump and his GOP allies yielded. Republicans hold majorities in both the House and Senate, along with the White House. However, Senate rules require 60 votes to proceed, and Republicans only had 52 votes in the Senate. This meant they needed to secure eight Democratic votes.
Senate Democrats assessed the situation, the polling data, and their own capabilities. They concluded that their desire to oppose Trump’s unilateral power grab was not matched by their ability to effectively prevent it. Political scientists would argue that true power lies where will and capacity coincide. Democrats had the power to shut down the government but lacked the ability to convince the public that the Republicans were to blame or to present a unified plan for reopening the government on more favorable terms.
The current challenge lies in how Democrats will address the Schumer situation. They are currently very reserved, but there are faint murmurs about whether Schumer will retain his position as Minority Leader for the remainder of his term. Both progressive and rank-and-file members of the party were uncomfortable with this decision, and navigating this challenging situation into 2026 is a task not to be taken lightly.
To be clear, Schumer is not in immediate danger of being removed from his position, and Democrats do not share House Republicans’ tendency to self-destruct. Schumer’s actions are based on calculations, not emotions. His decision to prioritize keeping the government open at the expense of legislative power was driven by rationality, not impulsiveness. However, it still came at a cost, primarily his standing with frustrated Democrats who expect the opposition party to fulfill its role: to oppose an administration determined to dismantle a government it despises.
For now, the government continues to function. Democrats see their ability to check Trump diminished for the time being. And until Congress changes course, the legislative branch will take a backseat to the executive branch.
Make sense of what matters in Washington. .