Davos Businesses’ Climate Stance Amidst Trump Administration “`

SWITZERLAND-DAVOS-POLITICS-ECONOMY

(Subscribe to the TIME CO2 Leadership Report newsletter for this story.)

At President Trump’s inauguration, leading global companies witnessed his pledge to rescind the Green New Deal and expand fossil fuel drilling.

However, at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, the narrative shifted. Major banks highlighted clean energy financing opportunities in developing nations. Manufacturers emphasized climate risks to their supply chains. Energy companies showcased renewable energy investments.

This suggests that businesses will continue pursuing profitable climate initiatives, even under Trump’s administration, sometimes without explicitly framing them as such. Ingka Group (IKEA) CEO Jesper Brodin stated, “Leading companies are undergoing tech and climate transformations. The benefits are clear, and this is irreversible.”

This commitment isn’t purely altruistic. Many companies have integrated climate programs into long-term plans, investing billions in projects difficult to reverse, like clean technology manufacturing and energy efficiency upgrades. Retracting would mean wasted capital.

The financial incentives for clean energy and electric vehicles remain strong. MarĂ­a Mendiluce, CEO of the We Mean Business Coalition, noted that “despite the noise, market fundamentals remain solid.”

Furthermore, companies are addressing climate risks. Recent extreme weather events have disrupted supply chains, raising concerns. A WEF report indicated unprepared companies could face up to a 25% earnings reduction by 2050 without adaptation measures. While this timeframe may seem distant, the impact of fires, droughts, and floods on supply chains is immediate.

Torsten Lichtenau of Bain & Company stated, “Sustainability strategy is outdated; it’s now about business strategy integrating sustainability.”

Counterarguments exist. Trump’s presidency might hinder investment in sectors reliant on government support, potentially impacting technologies like hydrogen and biofuels.

Also, conference attendance bias exists. Davos attendees may be less likely to discuss plans to reverse climate initiatives, and European businesses, often more environmentally conscious than their American counterparts, are overrepresented.

Therefore, showcasing successful climate-friendly business practices is crucial. Brodin presented Ingka Group’s financial performance alongside its emissions reduction: a 30% emissions decrease coupled with a 24% revenue increase since 2015. He challenged the notion that climate-conscious practices are costly.

The apparent alignment of climate initiatives with pro-Trump stances is complex. Trump’s reception at Davos was less than overwhelmingly enthusiastic. However, many companies see no conflict or disregard it. Companies like Amazon, Google, and Meta, for example, continue investing heavily in clean electricity for their data centers, illustrating a focus on what they likely view as sound business practices.