AOL Founder Steve Case Draws Parallels Between the Dotcom Boom and the AI Revolution
The 25th anniversary of the dotcom bust this March offers both a warning and inspiration as we navigate the current AI boom. AI, similar to the internet in the 1990s, is seen as revolutionary, with significant investment and high valuations fueling excitement and speculation. However, history suggests that AI may take longer to reach its full potential than many anticipate, and some ventures will fail.
As co-founder of AOL, I witnessed the Internet revolution firsthand. I see key lessons from that period that apply to the AI boom today. The parallels between the Internet’s evolution and the potential AI revolution are becoming evident.
Transformative technologies usually take time to mature, but adoption can accelerate quickly under the right conditions. Policymakers must carefully balance promoting innovation with responsible oversight, as excessive regulation can hinder progress. Market dynamics often favor early adopters, but industry concentration in AI risks limiting opportunities for startups. Hype cycles are unavoidable, with overinvestment leading to corrections, but true innovations endure. These insights highlight the need for strategic regulation, open access, and a steady approach to shaping AI’s future.
First, technology adoption takes time, but it can accelerate rapidly. While AI might seem like an instant success, its origins date back over 70 years. Similarly, the Internet was in development for more than two decades before AOL became the first Internet company to go public in 1992.
AI has arguably taken longer to develop than the internet, but due to increased global interconnectedness, ChatGPT gained 100 million downloads in just three months after launch. In comparison, it took AOL nine years to reach 1 million subscribers. AOL’s first funding round in 1985 was only $1 million; today, some AI startups are raising $1 billion with little more than a promising idea and an experienced team.
Second, AI’s rapid adoption is compelling policymakers to act faster than they did with the Internet. The government played a vital role in the Internet’s success. Key decisions, such as the Telecommunications Act, which encouraged competition, and Congress’s decision to open Internet access to everyone, helped launch the digital age. However, because consumer adoption of the Internet was gradual, the government initially adopted a cautious approach and minimal regulation while monitoring its evolution and impact.
Now, there’s pressure to act quickly, especially given concerns about AI’s potential risks. Reaching an agreement on appropriate safeguards is important. However, concerns about potential negative outcomes shouldn’t lead to restrictive regulations that stifle AI’s many benefits or jeopardize the development of this strategically important technology. Finding the right balance between responsible oversight and fostering rapid innovation will be challenging.
Third, during the Internet boom, major corporations experimented with the technology, but few initially took it seriously. Many large American companies, like GE and AT&T, explored online strategies but doubted its broad appeal. Their hesitancy created an opportunity for new companies like AOL and Yahoo. However, AI is different. Major tech companies like Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon are all heavily invested, creating an arms race to dominate AI. This raises concerns for startups. Unlike the early days of the Internet, the development of foundational AI platforms is mainly concentrated in a few dominant firms. Open-source AI could promote broader access and innovation. Without it, AI could exacerbate inequality, and new disruptive startups may struggle.
Fourth, hype and FOMO will inevitably cause market corrections. In the late 1990s, the belief that “the Internet will change everything” led to inflated valuations. While that belief was accurate, the changes didn’t happen overnight or for every company. When the bubble burst, many dismissed the Internet as a fad. Even within AOL Time Warner, there were skeptics. In reality, the shakeout led to the failure of many companies, but the strongest, like Google and Amazon, thrived.
AI is currently experiencing a similar hype cycle. There’s a rush to invest early, reminiscent of the dotcom era, as investors fear missing out on the next big thing. However, as with the Internet, not every AI startup will succeed; in fact, most will fail.
Still, the technological trend is real. The Internet led to a paradigm shift that changed our lives, and AI will do the same. But be prepared, because if the dotcom bust is any indication, it will be a turbulent ride.
“`