Digital Chamber Advocates for CLARITY Act Passage

TLDR

• The Digital Chamber has introduced a website enabling voters to reach out to legislators regarding the CLARITY Act.
• The purpose of the CLARITY Act is to establish federal regulations for digital asset markets.
• On May 14, the Senate Banking Committee moved the bill forward with a 15-9 vote.
• In July 2025, the House approved a prior iteration of the bill by a 294-134 margin.
• Anti-money laundering, decentralized finance, and ethics provisions are still major points of discussion ahead of a Senate floor vote.

---

The Digital Chamber has initiated a fresh public campaign calling on Congress to approve the CLARITY Act. This comes as cryptocurrency advocacy organizations intensify their push for federal digital asset market structure regulations before the 2026 midterm elections gain momentum.

The group unveiled a website where users can contact their representatives to express support for the legislation. The site features a constituent contact form, policy materials, and a summary document outlining the bill’s proposed regulatory framework for digital assets.

Cody Carbone, CEO of the Digital Chamber, stated that legislators must hear directly from voters, developers, and consumers who are demanding clear regulations for cryptocurrency markets. The organization indicated this initiative is part of a larger strategy to get the bill through Congress within the current year.

Digital Chamber Launches Public Call to Action

The CLARITY Act, officially titled the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, seeks to implement federal regulations for cryptocurrency exchanges, token issuers, brokers, and other market players. Proponents argue the legislation would clarify the responsibilities of U.S. regulators and lessen ambiguity about whether specific digital assets are classified as securities or commodities.

Citing a May survey of 992 U.S. adults by Security.Org, the Digital Chamber noted that over 70 million Americans hold cryptocurrency. The organization contends these users require consumer safeguards and unambiguous operational standards established by federal statute.

This campaign coincides with efforts by other crypto advocacy organizations—such as the Crypto Council for Innovation, the Blockchain Association, and Stand With Crypto—to engage with lawmakers. Their lobbying focus is on senators who could sway whether the bill garners sufficient support for passage.

Senate Vote Remains Central to Crypto Bill

The Senate Banking Committee approved H.R. 3633 with a bipartisan 15-9 vote on May 14. Democrat Ruben Gallego sided with all 13 committee Republicans in favor of the proposal, advancing it toward a potential vote by the full Senate.

The House of Representatives passed a previous version of the bill with a 294-134 vote in July 2025. Progress on the Senate version has been slowed by debates over matters including stablecoin rewards, decentralized finance, anti-money laundering regulations, and ethics provisions concerning public officials with cryptocurrency holdings.

Passage in the full Senate would require 60 votes. Carbone has indicated that the ethics-related wording will probably need to be resolved before the bill is brought to the floor, as Senate leadership would seek assurance of its viability.

Senator Cynthia Lummis has suggested a floor vote could occur by August. The timing is under close scrutiny, as Congress has a packed schedule before its summer break and an election period that could reduce opportunities for legislative progress.

Crypto Policy Debate Moves Into Election Season

The drive to pass the CLARITY Act is unfolding as cryptocurrency policy gains prominence in federal election campaigns. Political action committees linked to the digital asset industry have endorsed candidates perceived as favorable to crypto legislation.

This week, Representative Christian Menefee, a candidate backed by cryptocurrency super PACs, won a Democratic primary runoff against long-serving Congressman Al Green. This outcome has heightened focus on the political influence of digital asset organizations during the midterm election cycle.

Opposition in the Senate persists. Senator Elizabeth Warren has denounced the bill, arguing it provides insufficient anti-money laundering protections and ethics standards. She has also expressed worries about officials and their relatives profiting from cryptocurrency enterprises while involved in crafting relevant policy.

Industry associations have positioned the bill as a counter to what they term “Operation Choke Point 2.0,” a reference to alleged unofficial regulatory pressure on banks and crypto companies. Advocates say market structure legislation would transition oversight into a formal regulatory process.

The Digital Chamber’s new website aims to convert industry backing into direct messages from constituents to Congress. This campaign is part of a wider push to establish a national regulatory framework for cryptocurrency before year’s end.

For cryptocurrency firms, the CLARITY Act continues to be a primary legislative pathway to federal market regulations. For legislators, the discussion focuses on consumer protection, financial crime prevention, regulatory agency jurisdiction, and the integration of digital assets into U.S. financial law.